Peer Support as a Strategic Lever for Addressing Indonesia's Higher Education Completion Crisis

Authors

  • Hanifah Qonita Mutmainnatul Qolbi Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Ira Mirawati Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Kismiyati El Karimah Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62672/telad.v4i2.137

Keywords:

Communication theory, Gen Z, Indonesian education, Peer support, Student retention

Abstract

Indonesia faces a critical higher education completion crisis, with only 28.7% of students graduating on time, a stark contrast to the OECD average of 68%. This challenge is intensified by a recent policy reducing the maximum study period to five years. While institutional responses have predominantly focused on top-down, resource-intensive infrastructure, a fundamental resource remains critically underutilized: structured peer support. This commentary argues that peer support is not a peripheral activity but a central, cost-effective strategic lever for improving graduation rates. Grounded in House's (1981) Social Support Theory and informed by contemporary evidence from educational psychology, neurobiology, and digital culture, this paper bridges global best practices with the Indonesian context. Critically, we identify a specific gap in the literature: while the efficacy of peer support is globally recognized, there is a lack of a culturally-adapted framework that systematically integrates Indonesia's collectivist values (gotong royong) with the digitally-native behaviors of Gen Z students. By analyzing the four dimensions of missing support emotional, instrumental, informational, and appraisal this article highlights the unique alignment between peer support mechanisms and Indonesia's socio-cultural landscape. It concludes with actionable policy recommendations for institutions, national policymakers, and student organizations to leverage this scalable solution to transform the nation's higher education landscape.

References

Acheson, D. J., Sulek, R., & Zubizarreta, J. (2021). Peer tutoring in higher education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(8), 1082–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1828913

APJII. (2023). Penetrasi internet Indonesia 2023. Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023). Statistik pendidikan tinggi Indonesia 2023. BPS.

Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112.

Cahyadi, A., & Wijaya, R. (2024). Digital learning communities as survival mechanisms for Indonesian Gen Z university students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), 45–58.

Carnevale, A., Smith, N., & Strohl, J. (2020). Recovery: Job growth and education requirements through 2020. Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.

Chan, C. K. K., & Pow, J. (2024). The roles of collaborative learning in fostering academic competencies in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-023-09503-1

Chen, S. X., Cheung, F. M., Bond, M. H., & Leung, K. (2018). Personality and social support in Hong Kong and mainland China: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(5), 657–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118768645

Chen, X. P., & Li, S. L. (2023). Navigating the paradox of harmony and critique in collectivist cultures. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 22(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2021.0181

Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310

Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.

Dickerson, S. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004). Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 355–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.351

Eaton, J. S. (2024). The future of quality assurance in higher education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 56(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2023.2278256

European Commission. (2024). European strategy for universities. Publications Office of the European Union. https://education.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-01/european-strategy-for-universities.pdf

Falk, E. B., & O'Donnell, M. B. (2024). The social brain in the digital age: A review of neural mechanisms and implications for communication. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 25(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-023-00733-9

Geertz, C. (1962). The religion of Java. Free Press.

Heinrichs, M., von Dawans, B., & Domes, G. (2009). Oxytocin as a modulator of social behavior. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 30(4), 548–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2009.05.005

Hofstede Insights. (2023). Country comparison: Indonesia. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/indonesia/

House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Addison-Wesley.

Jalal, F., & Musthafa, B. (2021). Kualitas dan mutu pendidikan tinggi Indonesia: Tantangan dan harapan. Penerbit LP2M UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., ... & Noroozi, O. (2023). How is learning regulated in CSCL? A systematic review and a research agenda. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(2), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41219-022-00271-3

Kaur, S., & Noman, M. (2024). Adapting Western peer learning models for Asian educational contexts: A systematic review of challenges and strategies. Higher Education Research & Development, 43(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2229251

Kurniawan, D., & Hidayat, D. (2024). The prevalence of anxiety and depression among Indonesian university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 337, 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.10.076

Lee, M., & Cai, Z. (2024). The role of AI in supporting peer feedback in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 199, 104823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104823

Manca, S. (2020). Seeking social support on WhatsApp: The dynamics of a networked community of practice. Information, Communication & Society, 23(9), 1298–1314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1623789

O'Shea, S., Stone, C., & Delahunty, J. (2024). Harnessing the power of peer mentoring for first-generation students in collectivist cultures. Studies in Higher Education, 49(3), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2149899

OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2023-en

OECD. (2024). The pandemic hangover: Addressing student disengagement and mental health in higher education. OECD Publishing.

Oliver, B., & Jorre de St Jorre, T. (2023). Graduate attributes and micro-credentials: A new era for higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 42(7), 1351–1366. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2217998

Pangkalan Data Pendidikan Tinggi. (2023). Data statistik perguruan tinggi. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.

Park, C. L., & DiPierro, M. (2024). The role of social media in shaping academic identity and well-being among high-achieving students. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 61(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2023.2244871

Pearce, W. B., & Cronen, V. E. (1980). Communication, action, and meaning: The creation of social realities. Praeger.

Rienties, B., & Toetenel, K. (2024). Supporting student success through learning analytics and social network analysis: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 195, 104680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104680

Sullivan, G., & Kelloway, E. K. (2024). Cross-cultural perspectives on feedback-seeking and giving in organizations and educational settings. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Business Psychology, 11, 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012423-025151

The World Bank. (2022). Learning poverty in East Asia and the Pacific: A crisis of inequality and quality in education. The World Bank.

Topping, K. J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education, 32(3), 321–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138870

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO.

Wilcox, P., & Fyvie, J. (2023). The impact of Supplemental Instruction on student success: A meta-analysis. Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 35(2), 89–110.

Downloads

Published

12-02-2026

How to Cite

Qolbi, H. Q. M., Mirawati, I., & El Karimah, K. (2026). Peer Support as a Strategic Lever for Addressing Indonesia’s Higher Education Completion Crisis. Teaching, Learning, and Development, 4(2), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.62672/telad.v4i2.137

Issue

Section

Articles